Media Hypocrisy On The Female Image

I’m sat here watching the News, trying to motivate myself into getting ready for the second day of the GPU. You’d think being a hijabi means I don’t have to concern myself too much with my “image” but you’d be wrong.

I wouldn’t say I spend hours agonizing over what to wear, or how to make sure the colour of my headscarf matches my shoes, which should also match my handbag, and shiny hijab pin. I only own a handful of handbags and shoes, which usually makes my choice simple: black, white or pink (c’mon, I’m a girl!).

Then I see a report that reminds me that McCain’s VP, Mizz Palin has spent $150K on a recent “makeover”. I remember being mildly shocked at the amount when I first heard it a few days ago, but this time my reaction was more sympathetic:
“Of course she did. Imagine the headlines if she was seen twice in the same outfit!”.

Though I could never agree with anyone burning that much cash on cloth, nor am I any kind of fan of Palin, she really is in between a rock and a hard place being a female public figure.

Male politicians are expected to wear suits, which all kinda look the same; the most daring mark of self expression and individuality being their choice of tie colour. As long as the shoes are smart, it matters little how much they cost, or how many times they’ve been worn.

But not for women. And here, female commentators are the worst. Positively bitchy! Whether it’s the fashion mags or the News at 10. Slim women are “anorexic” and blamed for poor body image amongst teens, but then are ripped to shreds when they put on a few pounds.

Shut up you silly mares! Honestly, get a real job! Stop bringing your own species down with your back biting and hypocrisy. Ergh!

Anyway, now I’m running late so I better head off. I’ll continue this rant another day (no doubt!).